Tragedy of Errors: A Critique of the Vatican's Document on the Third Secret of Fatima

The Vatican is operating in bad faith. It was bad enough to suppress the 3rd Secret for forty years; it has gone a step further now by substituting a small part of the Secret for the real Secret itself. Unfortunately for those promoting this sham—but happily for the rest of us—too much is already known of the Third Secret for them to succeed in pulling off this legerdemain. We will prove to you now how difficult it is to cover up your tracks when you are not telling the truth.

First of all, the present Holy Father, John Paul II, has already admitted that his predecessors have already released excerpts of the Third Secret through diplomatic channels, excerpts which mention a 3rd World War before the end of the 20th century in which millions will die by the minute. Does this sound like the supposedly symbolical message that they trying to pass off as the 3rd Secret? Would the Vatican have kept hidden the Secret for all these years if it was just this innocuous vision which they are now presenting to us? Would the Vatican have silenced Sister Lucy for more than thirty years simply for this vision? She is not allowed to talk to anyone concerning Fatima without the Pope's or Cardinal Ratzinger's approval. Why all this fear concerning the 3rd Secret? Perhaps a case of a bad conscience, and the fear of exposure (Fatima experts believe that the Secret speaks of the guilt of the upper hierarchy in causing the apostasy we are witnessing today)?

The Vatican commentators falsely assume that the Collegial Consecration of Russia has been done when the contrary is true. John Paul II himself stated in his solemn entrustment of the world to the Immaculate Heart of Mary in 1982 and again on March 25, 1984: “Enlighten especially the people whose consecration and entrusting you are awaiting from us.” The Holy Father is here openly admitting that he was not doing the right thing yet. The reason he gave for not mentioning Russia as the specific object of the Consecration was that he was afraid of offending the Soviet leaders. In the months that followed, the principal Fatima experts, like Father Antonio Maria Martins and Father Messias Coelho, agreed that the consecration had not been properly done. Sister Lucy, contrary to what the Vatican is affirming in this Document, in more than one interview has stated that the Consecration was not done properly as “There was no participation of all the bishops, and there was no mention of Russia.” The so-called typewritten copies attributed to Sister Lucy declaring the Consecration done have been proven to be forgeries. Fr. Nicholas Gruner, another Fatima expert, had one such letter analyzed by a forensic scientist, accredited by the Courts of Canada as an expert, confirmed that it was not Sister Lucy's handwritten signature.

In their Document, they interpret the part of the vision where the bishop dressed in white gets shot to death by soldiers with bullets and arrows as referring to the attempted assassination of John Paul II in St. Peter's Square on May 13, 1981. This is really a crude, juvenile attempt to recast what are obviously future events within the mold of past historical events. We recommend that they dig a little deeper into the Vatican coffers to seek out professional help in order to find, like Pharaoh, another Joseph or dream interpreter, who is worth his salt.

Archbishop Bertone's statement: “The decision of His Holiness Pope John Paul II to make public the third part of the secret of Fatima brings to an end a period of history marked by tragic human lust for power and evil...” and Cardinal Sodano's words that “the events to which the third part of the ‘secret’ of Fatima refers now seem part of the past” are laughable in their simple-mindedness. The Cardinal believes that Russia and its satellites have given up atheism and have been converted. How can that be when the abortion rate has soared in Russia (70 % of the pregnancies end in abortion) , and its government is dominated by atheistic “ex-communists” and recycled KGB agents. The facts instead indicate that the Russian leaders' claims to have given up Communism is nothing more than a ruse to fool the West so that it lets down its guard and disarms itself. Russia continues to spend close to 40% of its Gross National Product on its military. They build another nuclear submarine every six weeks. They are now six to eight times more powerful than the United States military. They have been preparing for war all along. The American public have been lulled to sleep by the controlled news media. High on drugs and a booming economy, we are too stupid to see the destruction that lies just ahead. (To be continued)